<link rel="alternate" type="application/atom.aspx" title="RSS Feed for chblog.ozarkattitude.com" href="/rss/" />
User-agent:
Mediapartners-Google
Disallow:

It doesn’t even matter that I no longer live in
Illinois. It has been eight years since I’ve been gone, yet I remain deeply
involved on a level that is apparently even beyond my own awareness. For the
many years that I was active against the project, wounds remain unhealed. That
was evidenced by the mere sight of this weekend’s diametrically opposed events
that took place on eastern Will County soil.
On one side, there was a peaceful gathering of
protestors who oppose the airport—a group that I have long associated with. Many
of the individuals present were those I helped personally recruit to the
airport opposition, long ago, when we were first learning about the proposed
airport easily seen as a menace to the rural landscape. Worse yet, many of
those good folks I had the privilege to know were not there. So many have died
during the battle, just as surely as if they were Sioux Indians that died
fighting to protect their land or soldiers at Gettysburg that fought for
freedom that never made it off the battlefield. It is this part that haunts me
the most. No one’s life should end sooner than expected because of unresolved
peril in their lives at their own governments’ hand. Yet the State of Illinois
persists in this unproven folly.
Just a short distance away, on land that isn’t even
in the airport site, there was a gathering of people who support the
airport—people from someplace else, who believe a new airport is a panacea—as a
means to solve their own economic conditions. They give no thought to those who
would be displaced. The people who live there are not discussed. The people
believe what they are told, largely because they trust the one who tells them. I
have no qualm with the people. I do have a problem with those who hold
positions of power, who masquerade as leaders in the community, as they tell
blatant lies and half truths because it will serve their own purpose. Such
false idols never flinch about using innocent members of the public to ensure they
get what they want.
This is becoming so common place; it is perpetuated
throughout the government once billed as the government of the people, for the
people, and by the people. The airport fight is just one small example of all
that is wrong with the government and leadership today. I have seen this
example for decades. They are a politician here, government worker there, or an
investment banker, realtor, stockbroker, or union worker. The story is always
the same. They tell their followers—this will help you. Except it won’t! Never
do they tell the story of the other side—those freedom fighters who simply want
to protect their way of life and livelihood.
Saturday, Congressman Jesse Jackson Jr.,
accompanied a group of south suburban pastors who support his version of airport
obsession. I gathered as much of the news coverage as I could—including live
videos of the event. Not only was I there in spirit, but I could have been
there. It was déjà vu for me. Nothing changes. I’ve seen hundreds of similar
events since my own opposition to this project was borne in 1987. The events
may have a slightly different flair, but even many of the words are the same.
The group recited the Lord’s Prayer. Generally
prayers over the land are generally for a good crop or sufficient rainfall. Yet
the consequence of this prayer would result in the destruction of people’s
lives and livelihoods. In the course of the closing prayer, the ministers and
assembled crowd asked to be forgiven for their trespasses. Indeed, they would
need to be forgiven because they wanted to trespass and covet their neighbor at
the same time. Jackson audaciously urged people to stay off the cropland, in
order to protect the farmer’s rights. As if he really cared about farmers’
rights.
I looked around at the faces of the people who were
bussed to a local church in Monee, a church that I watched being built, I noticed
the people. They didn’t fit. That isn’t because they were mostly African-Americans,
yet that is true as well. But they are different because they are suburbanites.
They dressed differently; the predominant clothing was not blue jeans. Some of
the ladies wore hats. Rural folks don’t wear hats, except for cowboy hats, or
perhaps baseball caps. Music played in the background, rather raucous Gospel
music, a far cry from “The Old Rugged Cross,” which is the kind of hymn that is
played in area churches.
I can almost guarantee that on the trip to Monee,
one of more of the people asked, “Are we there yet?” At the same time, I’ll bet
none of them connected the distance to the protest site with the same long
distance it would be to travel to work everyday—that is if the airport were
built, and successful, as Jackson fantasizes.
A friend of mine taught literacy to students in South
Suburban Robbins. Her students told her they needed a job, but didn’t have a
drivers’ license nor could they afford a car. For them, or countless others who
can’t afford the gas to travel that distance, a job in Peotone is out of the
question. Yet that is exactly who Jackson targets for airport jobs.
The distance is a real point. During my many years
in the “airport fight,” I have known people who visited the Peotone area from
Chicago. Many were reporters who found it difficult to file a story so far away
because of the travel time taking away from writing a story or editing video.
It is logistically difficult for Chicago news media to cover stories in the
Peotone area.
The Peotone area is segregated from other populated
areas, just like all rural areas. But the notion that their segregation
translates into racism is a real stretch, one that is easily and often exploited.
The culture of rural folks requires putting down deep roots into a community; often
times they are roots that span generations. They pretty much know everyone in
their area. Consequently, they are not very trusting of strangers. Being black
has nothing to do with it. They don’t trust anyone they don’t know.
Exploiting such situations is a stretch that the Jacksons
apparently love to make. Many believe that is what is behind this march to the
cornfields. Identifying racism, whether it exists or not, makes headlines. That
is what the Jacksons and many other black leaders seem to be about. Bringing
attention to racism is good. Perpetuating for your own gain is not.
Building an airport that displaces farms and an
entire farm economy will not solve the problems in the far reaches of the second
congressional district, especially one that consists of one ribbon of concrete
and a terminal building. Even if it were wildly successful, it wouldn’t produce
enough jobs to solve the unemployment problem. And, it would do nothing to
solve the other systemic ills that have long plagued the poorest communities in
the south suburbs. Jackson has to know that.
The recent remapping of the second congressional district
was purely political, designed strictly to benefit Jackson and his airport
aspirations. He is taking full advantage, even though he has wrongly tried to
pass the Peotone area off as within his district since he first took office.
Even if an airport were built near Peotone, it
would do nothing to solve the problems in the south suburbs, only one of which
is high unemployment. It is foolish to believe that economic development forty
miles from the population base would help the situation there.
In fact, south suburban residents already have
access to one of the world’s largest intermodal developments—where there are far
more jobs than an airport with one runway and terminal building could ever create.
The Centerpoint development is just 35 miles from downtown Harvey, just a few
miles further than it would be to drive to Peotone. In addition, the
Gary/Chicago Airport is only 20 minutes away, yet Congressman Jackson is
apparently repelled by the invisible state line, since he refuses to look to
that development as a potential jobs creator.
This is a guest post from George Ochsenfeld in response to Algernon Penn:
Dear Mr. Penn,
Thank you for your thoughtful letter
concerning the proposed Peotone airport. Obviously you are deeply concerned
about economic conditions in the south suburbs. So am I. Although you do not
know me personally, I suspect we would agree on many issues related to social
and economic justice, such as the negative impact of racism (whether
institutional, structural, or personal/unconscious), and entrenched class
oppression.
Mr. Penn, I understand your strong feelings on this issue. However,
I think it is unfair to conflate me with the local unions in Will and Kankakee
Counties. I agree with your critique of these unions, and I oppose them. I also
oppose the Will County governmental officials, who are more concerned about
donations and support from these construction unions than they are about
residents of eastern Will County.
I especially think that it is unfair to equate me with enemies of
Rosa Parks and the civil rights movement. I’ve been fighting the airport for 22
years, long before Congressman Jackson was elected. My opposition to the airport
is, in part, the typical “not in my backyard” reaction: I don’t want to lose my
home, or breathe jet fumes, hear loud noise, or have traffic congestion. Also, I
oppose IDOT forcefully taking land before the FAA approves the project. But my
strongest objection is on environmental grounds: aviation is a highly
destructive form of transportation. The current industrial system is killing the
planet and moving us toward economic collapse—and, as you know, it is
traditionally oppressed groups who get hurt quickest and hardest when economies
fail. Please read my recent essay (in the attachment) expressing my concerns
about our dysfunctional economic system.
Hopefully, if the airport is not built, the state-owned land can be
used to create urban agricultural jobs and businesses for the unemployed
producing local, healthy food for the hungry, as is currently being done in
Detroit http://detroitevolution.com/detroit-local-foods/ Milwaukee
http://www.mkeurbanag.org/Main/AboutMUAN Chicago http://auachicago.org/ and elsewhere. I
would gladly work with you, Mr. Penn or any others to this end. I wish I could
come up with a remedy that provided high paying jobs to all, starting with those
who have been locked out. But I can’t.
As far as people being upset about ministers coming out to pray for
the airport, (and let’s not be disingenuous, that is what they are doing) it’s
important to remember that from our perspective, the fruition of their prayers
would mean the destruction of our homes, communities, and farms.
There is a
fundamental premise about which you and I disagree. You believe a South Suburban
Airport will create many permanent jobs. I do not. Please hear my arguments.
First of all, it
is unlikely that the airport will ever be built, and if build, it would most
likely be a white elephant (like MidAmerica near St. Louis), which would not
produce jobs.
For example,
Michael Boyd, aviation consultant,
recently garnered widespread media attention when he denounced the Peotone
project as being an unneeded, politically driven boondoggle which would be a
repeat of the barely used downstate MidAmerica airport, which he describes as a
“monument to dishonest planning.”
[Pantagraph, January 14, 2012]. http://www.pantagraph.com/news/state-and-regional/illinois/critics-say-peotone-destined-to-be-illinois-second-midamerica/article_cfe8f058-3f1d-11e1-ac05-001871e3ce6c.html
Another expert, Daniel Rust, a commercial air travel expert and
assistant director for Undergraduate Program Development at University of
Missouri-St. Louis, said recently that there is not a need for new airports and
that there is a high probability that Peotone would end up like the MidAmerica
airport. http://thesouthern.com/news/local/flight-to-nowhere/article_14f5b5ca-3f3a-11e1-b595-0019bb2963f4.html
According to the January 14, 2012 article in the Pantagraph,
http://www.pantagraph.com/news/state-and-regional/illinois/critics-say-peotone-destined-to-be-illinois-second-midamerica/article_cfe8f058-3f1d-11e1-ac05-001871e3ce6c.html
in
the past five years there has been a 10 percent drop in the number of people
flying in and out of the state’s nine main airports, American Airlines recently
joined the rest of the major carriers in bankruptcy, and Southwest is reducing
its flights.
IDOT pushed for the development of MidAmerica just as they are
pushing for Peotone, because that agency benefits from large projects. They used
the same consultants, TAMS (now Earthtech), to fudge the numbers for Peotone as
they used for MidAmerica, i.e. more “dishonest planning.” The FAA simply goes
along—they approved failed MidAmerica and Murtha airports. Their approval does
not mean much in terms of whether a project will succeed.
There is no need for a cargo airport. D.C. Velocity, (September 8, 2009) an
aviation trade journal, examined whether Peotone could compete with O’Hare on
hauling cargo. They reported that O’Hare is adding 750,000 square feet of cargo
space and 18 additional parking spaces for freighter aircraft. When they asked
the vice president of air freight for North America for Deutsche Post DHL, the
world’s largest freight carrier, if the region needed another cargo airport, he
replied, “Not really.”
The ever-increasing price of jet fuel, concerns about global
warming, and advances in telecommunication all make it likely that the days of
continuous expansion of aviation are over.
I strongly urge you to
re-examine your basic premises about the airport creating jobs. I will gladly meet with you to provide
further documentation supporting my contention that the proposed South Suburban
airport will not create jobs.
Oh, one more thing. Gandhi said, “First they ignore you. Then they
ridicule you. Then they attack you. Then you win.” I guess only time will tell
if that saying refers more to me or you.
Sincerely,
George Ochsenfeld